i completely disagree (sorry, i'm a huge crichton fan)
i think its amazing how in depth he goes into his subjects, because its a fun way to learn about topics that you'd otherwise probably not pick up a text book and start reading about.
and, i think he does an excellent job of balancing the "science" of his novels, with the character development. I found it very easy to relate to his characters...particularly so in jurassic park and the lost world.
i guess overall, its not for everyone...but i think he's super-di-duper great
I agree with you. He explains his scientific matters well and in a fairly detailed manner while not making the reader feel like a retard. And it's always interesting. His characters are kinda typical but they're crafted well enough that you can easily relate to them and care about them.
I disagree. I think his characters, especially in "The Lost World", "Jurassic Park" and even "Sphere" were cookie cutter. It's easy to relate to characters you've read about in hundreds of other novels.
i dont know how you can call characters like those in sphere and lost world cookie cutter... how often do you read about dinosaur hunters and teams who study accident sites?
Webby is right. His characters are structurally VERY similar.
Those are just the situations they're placed in. Think of boy bands and the way they follow a formula: The cute one, the bad boy, the innocent one, etc. That's what I mean by cookie cutter. His characters aren't very deep.
in sphere they were pretty deep... geologically speaking anyway
BAHAHAHA! i like how the food was different. whipped cream was something different. the cream won't whip under pressure. interesting.