Digitali
Hmmmm, so i need a camera, but should i get a digital or normal one? If i get a digital camera, i will definitely get better pictures, in quality. But what about when i want tot takethe pictures somewherefor people to see. I would haveto printtem ou and all that junk. But inbthe other hand, digital cameras are just cool! Which should i choose?
AI Summary
14 Comments
digital cameras aren't necesarily better quality then regular cameras. the resolution on film is like 100 times finer than the best digital camera out there.
depends what you want to do with the pics. if you're gonna use them for web-pages or manipulate them in Photoshop, then use a digital (its usually better than scanning in prints). If you're want prints to hold in your hand get a regular camera (its usually better than printing out .jpgs on a photo-printer)
yeah
i was thinkin the same thing, cuz when you print pictures out from a digital camera, and dont have a really good printer...they come out pretty nastey
just get a regular camera...nikon n80
I'm actually in the market for a good film camera, not too pricey. you have this one? you like it? why?
i bought it as a gift. it was recommended by an FBI forensic photographer who said it was the best amateur camera on the market (that was sept 2001). you can't go wrong with nikon. and, if ur taking outdoor photos, fuji film is better than kodak
i like that nikon flip thing chloe had on smallville last night. that thing is pretty nice.
i take so many pictures all the time, and i have considered getting digital but then the thought of why? came to me since i give all the doubles out for everybody else to have them and such that it doesn't really serve my purpose. also best film overall that i don't use anything else from experience is Kodak, speed 800. that's just because i take tons of mid-action shots. if you don't do that 600 or 400 is fine.
Go with film, I say.
Hey, and do you have an interlingua thing going on now? Look at the name of this journal, and the one before it.
by