Skip to main content
0 online

Beatlemaniacs: New "Let It Be" On The Way!

delliott101 by delliott101 · Feb 2, 2003 · Article · 167 views


(Culled from different sources in and around the 'net and thanks to forrestina for bringing it to my attention!)


The surviving Beatles are planning to re-release "Let It Be" the way they intended: stripped down. The album will have the same track listing, but it will not have the orchestration that producer Phil Spector added to it after the band broke up.


The "Let It Be" movie will also be released on DVD, and this summer the originally 1996 "Beatles Anthology" documentary will also be released on DVD.


Ringo Starr has announced that a "stripped down" version of Let It Be is being prepared for release.

In 1969, when most of the Let It Be tracks were recorded for an
album and film entitled Get Back, The Beatles were at odds on how to release the material.


Paul wanted an album with the Beatles returning to their roots as a
four-piece band plying rock and roll. He also had hopes of getting back on the road as such, hence the title Get Back. Early releases of the album came with a lavish book 'Get Back'. These are now highly collectible.


The film showed the group going through bad times and the project was temporarily abandoned. Meanwhile the group got themselves back together to some extent and recorded their final and one of their best albums, Abbey Road, with George Martin keeping order. The film, retitled Let It Be, was released the following year.


Then John insisted that Phil Spector, the legendary "Wall of Sound" producer be brought in to compile an album from the tapes although
Glynn Johns had already produced an album more or less ready for release.


Spector's work has always been a bone of contention with Paul, particularly the addition of strings to The Long and Winding Road.



Ringo told Rolling Stone that the new CD was "the de-Spectorised
version". He said: "Paul was always totally opposed to Phil. I told
him on the phone recently, 'Your're bloody right again, it sounds
great without Phil'. Which it does. Now we'll have to put up with him
telling us over and over again, 'I told you so!'"


He said: "It fills my heart with joy to hear the band that I was a
member of. They were just great. And also, the quietness of the
tracks. It's a beautiful CD. "


He added that George had approved the release of the new version before his death. He said that the project, under way for at least two years, instigated the recovery of the stolen Get Back tapes.


George has already had All Things Must Pass de-Spectorised so his approval is quite plausible.

To contribute to the discussion, please log in.

29 Comments

G
gollumOG 2003

i love the beatles. my mom got me into them. she still goes crazy when she sees Paul. he WAS cute! thank you for this clip!

delliott101 delliott101OG 2002

Not a problem... as you can tell, I love the Beatles too. Just listened to my monophonic version of Sgt Pepper on vinyl. Oh, and I have a bass guitar which is a clone of Paul's Hofner violin bass! Not hero worship, but just a cool bass... always wanted one and I would love to get the real thing, but I don't have $2000.00 for it...

rocksupastar rocksupastarFounder

Idol Worshipper.....

delliott101 delliott101OG 2002

Shup Mike........

ok4now ok4nowOG 2002

that's different

forrestina forrestinaOG 2002

thanks for filling in the gaps from what i read

ok4now ok4nowOG 2002

i'm not a big fan of revising art. it's like these movie directors that rerelease new versions of their films.

delliott101 delliott101OG 2002

I hear you, but this would be, as far as I can tell and saw, a CD in addition to the current version of the album... the way the Beatles wanted it to sound all along. We'll see how it goes.

ok4now ok4nowOG 2002

more goodies at rollingstone.com

ok4now ok4nowOG 2002

fyi...this is a pg-13 article!

ok4now ok4nowOG 2002

Lennon was not impressed: "If he doesn't come back by Tuesday," he snorted after Harrison left, "we get [Eric] Clapton."

ok4now ok4nowOG 2002

hmmm...what's going on with phil spector???

forrestina forrestinaOG 2002

i heard that much....if you hear anything else let me know...

forrestina forrestinaOG 2002
ok4now ok4nowOG 2002

i wonder what such a seemingly-nice girl was doing with loser-phil?

forrestina forrestinaOG 2002

one word for you: CREAM

ok4now ok4nowOG 2002

she was borrowing cream?

forrestina forrestinaOG 2002

it's an acronym... Cash Rules Everything Around Me

ilikebirds ilikebirdsOG 2002

thats so funny you had to break it down for him. hahaha... dollar dollar bill ya.

ok4now ok4nowOG 2002

hmmm...LSNED 

forrestina forrestinaOG 2002

speaking of cream....was listening to some this morn...good stuff!

ok4now ok4nowOG 2002

how wierd would it have been if clapton replaced harrison.

forrestina forrestinaOG 2002

i dont think that would've worked at all

delliott101 delliott101OG 2002 forrestina

Agreed.. I read years ago that The Beatles could have replaced any of the members, but then they felt it wouldn't be the Beatles anymore. Like gotten a new bassist or lead guitarist, but the whole dynamic would have been different.

ok4now ok4nowOG 2002 delliott101

isn't that the idea?

forrestina forrestinaOG 2002 ok4now

if it ain't broke don't fix it

ok4now ok4nowOG 2002

i heard robert blake was upset cuz phil got out on bail, but blake was held without bail...lol

hunkpapap hunkpapapOG 2003

hmmmm did you also hear he made friends with a pigeon????

ok4now ok4nowOG 2002

yes, howard, i did

Welcome Back to eZabel

It's been a while. Here's what's new.

eZabel Lore

A complete history of our community — stats, Hall of Fame, legendary threads, and more.

View the Lore →

Curator Commentary

Look for the blue speech bubbles on threads, profiles, and news — notes and context from iwz.

Everything Preserved

All 225,969 pieces of content from 2000–2014 are here — forums, messages, journals, photos, polls, and events.