i like the dialog on mr. rogers. you posed some pretty gripping questions that I think, subconsiously anyway, we have all at one time or another considered.
i thought i heard somewhere that he really was gay in real life. not surprising-i mean look at all those gay sweaters he wore.
come on you shouldn't make fun of his sweaters, sweaters are only gay when worn by gay people. so you're victimizing innocent sweaters for no reason.
plus you shouldn't make fun of or jest about gays. you should just hate them.
i guess have trouble expressing myself-my derision of the sweaters is just an expression of my contempt. OK sweater boy? it all depends on the type of sweater, too. and his were not of the heterosexual kind.
how do you have the right to assign gender to an inanimate article of clothing. Can you personify a sweater like that ? I think not. And wouldn't derision in itself already be comtemptous.
i have the rights to assign gender to inanimate articles of clothing given to me by the powers of the universe and that's all you need to know. who are you to question my authority? and yes, you can personify a sweater. get an imagination. btw, yes derision is contemptuous-that is why i stated that my derision is a way to EXPRESS my contempt. the sentence is correct. don't question me again.
wanna make out ?
i was hoping you would ask that. by "contempt" i really meant "make out". you read me so well.
see thats because we are on the same wave lengths. we were born on the same day and same year. i mean come on now.