so let me get this straight, when adam and eve were perfect t was okay to be naked? BUT when they had sinned it was wrong to be naked - hmm i never noticed that before how strange
hm i dont think you really got what i was saying, i think giac kinda explained it about the sexual aspect but i dont think Jehovah would have made them eventually think it was wrong to be naked - it is our perfect form and if we had stayed perfect we would never have needed clothes - did that make sense?
NOPE!
what about when it gets cold? huh? what then?
Grow hair
it makes sense to me, but I don't agree. After adam and eve sinned, they knew that it was wrong for them to continue to be naked. Jehovah's standards haven't changed, he just had not yet revealed to them that it was wrong to be naked. They just didn't know. Jehovah would have eventually taught them. They didn't have to wear clothes because now they were imperfect, they made clothes when the learned that it was wrong for them to be continue to be naked at all times--and they learned it by eating from that tree. Perfection has nothing to do with their era of nakedness. Knowlege of good and bad has everything to do with their ending the era of nakedness.
good point...i like the "era of nakedness"
very well put.... i hope you wont have to draw your little picture diagram for everyone. lol
"this is adam".....(I point to one stick figure), and this is eve....(pointing to the next stick figure) they had fig l..e...a...v..e...s.. (I say as I draw the leaves).
I did some reasearch and found out why Adam and Eve were clothed, it wasnt any sinful tendency, it was that they felt guilty for sinning against Jehaovah and felt ashamed that when naked they are viewd upon as pure, but they arent that anymore, so for that reason they clothed themselves out of embaressement. AND since it was a married couple and had the world to themselves there was no reason for them to be clothed before that, YET if they had a kid or neighbors for that matter, for modesty sake they would be clothed.
this whole conversation has to end, because nobody actually knows what they are talking about. besides that, the whole thing is just getting annoying
no hey that actually makes sense - thanks hun
No prob, most intellectual people would make sense of it, I guess funky aint intellectual....
and neither are you
yes, and this is proven by your use of "aint" how can you be an intellectual and use the word "aint"... hahaha
cause "aint" is a word. "aint" = are not, who taught you vocabulary??
actually, if you said "ain't that would make sense. but you didn't therefore, i believe my vocabulary is superior to YOURS!!! MUUUAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
and what does MUUUAHAHHAHAHAHAHA mean??
its a way you laugh when you are asked a dumb question
guys, why are you both fighting in here?! i go and see "4 new comments" and its two people angry!WHERES THE LOVE?! WHERES THE PEACE& HARMONY?!
its up ur NOSE!
*sticks finger up nose* *class looks at tina weird* *"im just checking for peace & harmony"*
HAHAHA.. sooo funny, i just started laughin here at work!!! hahahaha
Your so funny Tina...your the best!!
Tina - so funny lol
YOU ARE BOTH WRONG
It would be AREN't not ain't and really you should not even use aren't!
grrrrrrrr you boys